Evidence synthesis services delivered with speed, scale, and expert review
Synthesa supports abstract screening, systematic reviews, rapid evidence synthesis, meta-analysis, and network meta-analysis for CROs, medcomms agencies, pharma, medical device, MedTech, and research teams.
1,000,000+
abstracts screened
20,000+
outcomes meta-analysed
7 to 14 days
average project delivery
AI-powered workflows, delivered as a specialist service
Many teams want the benefits of AI in evidence synthesis, but do not want to adopt new software, redesign their workflows, or train internal teams.
Synthesa gives you the practical benefit of AI without the operational burden.
You define the evidence question, project scope, and required outputs. We manage the workflow, apply AI-powered screening and synthesis methods where appropriate, validate the outputs with expert review, and deliver structured evidence products your team can use.
Specialist evidence synthesis support across the full workflow
Abstract screening at scale
Screen large volumes of titles and abstracts against defined criteria, including search strategy, PICO framework, inclusion criteria, and exclusion criteria.
Best for
- Large search results
- Overflow support for CROs and medcomms agencies
- Parallel validation against internal screening
- Free pilot projects
- Projects where manual screening is too slow or impractical
Typical outputs
- Screened abstract list
- Inclusion and exclusion decisions
- Screening notes where required
- Structured export for your team
- Comparison against previous or parallel screening decisions
Systematic reviews for publication, strategy, and evidence planning
Synthesa supports structured literature reviews from screening through data extraction and synthesis, with expert validation throughout.
Best for
- Publication-focused evidence synthesis
- Medical affairs projects
- Medical device evidence reviews
- Market access and reimbursement discussions
- Evidence gap assessment
- CRO or medcomms client deliverables
Typical outputs
- Screening results
- Study selection documentation
- Evidence tables
- Study characteristic tables
- Data extraction tables
- Narrative synthesis
- Figures, tables, and structured reports
Focused evidence reviews for time-sensitive decisions
When your team needs reliable evidence quickly, Synthesa delivers focused reviews designed to answer practical questions without waiting months for a traditional evidence synthesis workflow.
Best for
- Internal decision-making
- Early evidence scoping
- Medical strategy
- MedTech startup planning
- Evidence gap assessment
- Pre-project feasibility assessment
Typical outputs
- Rapid literature summaries
- Evidence maps
- Key study summaries
- Evidence gap assessments
- Structured recommendations for next steps
- Decision-ready evidence briefs
Frequentist and Bayesian meta-analysis
Synthesa conducts statistical meta-analysis across complex evidence bases, including projects with multiple outcomes, heterogeneous reporting, and large extracted datasets.
Best for
- Publication-focused analyses
- Medical device evidence synthesis
- Multi-outcome reviews
- Bayesian random-effects models
- Meta-regression
- Sensitivity analyses
- Existing datasets that need statistical synthesis
Typical outputs
- Frequentist or Bayesian meta-analysis
- Forest plots
- Heterogeneity assessment
- Subgroup analyses where appropriate
- Meta-regression where appropriate
- Sensitivity analyses
- Publication-ready figures and tables
Network meta-analysis for comparative evidence synthesis
Synthesa supports frequentist and Bayesian network meta-analysis when teams need to compare multiple interventions, devices, procedures, or treatment approaches across a connected evidence network.
Best for
- Comparative evidence questions
- Multiple interventions or device categories
- Indirect comparisons
- Treatment or intervention ranking
- Market access and reimbursement support
- Specialist statistical synthesis needs
Typical outputs
- Network feasibility assessment
- Evidence network diagrams
- Frequentist or Bayesian network meta-analysis
- Comparative effect estimates
- Ranking outputs where appropriate
- Sensitivity analyses
- Structured interpretation of results
Use Synthesa for a defined work package or a full evidence synthesis project
You do not need to outsource the entire project to work with Synthesa.
Some clients ask us to support one technically demanding or time-consuming component. Others ask us to manage the full evidence synthesis workflow.
Work package support
Best when your internal team or agency already owns the project, but needs specialist capacity or faster execution.
Examples:
- Abstract screening only
- Data extraction support
- Statistical meta-analysis of an existing dataset
- Network meta-analysis feasibility assessment
- Independent comparison with past screening decisions
Full project delivery
Best when you want Synthesa to manage the evidence synthesis process from question definition through final outputs.
Examples:
- Full systematic review
- Rapid evidence synthesis
- Systematic review and meta-analysis
- Evidence gap assessment
- Medical device evidence review
- Publication-focused evidence synthesis
Faster than traditional workflows. More usable than another AI tool.
Synthesa is designed for teams that need the benefit of AI-enabled evidence synthesis without creating extra work internally.
Speed
Average project delivery in 7 to 14 days, depending on scope, dataset size, and analysis requirements.
Scale
Built for large evidence bases, including projects with hundreds of thousands of abstracts and many thousands of outcomes.
Expert validation
Outputs are reviewed by evidence synthesis experts, not simply generated by software.
Practical delivery
You receive structured outputs that fit your project needs, without managing a platform yourself.
Flexible engagement
Start with a free screening pilot, a defined work package, or a complete evidence synthesis project.
Start with a free abstract screening pilot
For qualified projects, Synthesa can run a free pilot using your defined search strategy and PICO criteria.
The pilot can run in parallel with your current screening process or be compared against a completed project.
What you receive
- Screened abstract list
- Inclusion and exclusion decisions
- Screening based on defined criteria
- Delivery within a few days
- Practical comparison against your current or previous process
Need evidence synthesis support for a specific project?
Tell us about your research question, literature set, timeline, and required outputs. We can help you decide whether to start with a pilot, a defined work package, or a full evidence synthesis project.