Scale evidence synthesis delivery without expanding your team
Synthesa partners with CROs and medcomms agencies to provide expert-led, AI-enabled support for abstract screening, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, network meta-analyses, and rapid evidence synthesis—helping teams manage complex client work, tight timelines, and overflow capacity without compromising quality.
1,000,000+
abstracts screened
20,000+
outcomes meta-analysed
7 to 14 days
average project delivery
When client work grows faster than internal capacity
Evidence synthesis projects can quickly strain internal teams. Screening can involve tens or hundreds of thousands of records. Data extraction can become a bottleneck. Meta-analysis may require specialist statistical expertise. Timelines are often compressed by publication plans, client expectations, conference deadlines, or internal decision cycles.
Synthesa gives CROs and medcomms agencies a specialist delivery partner for evidence synthesis work, without the need to hire, train, or implement new software.
We can support a defined work package or contribute across the full evidence synthesis workflow.
Flexible support for your evidence synthesis pipeline
Abstract screening
Use Synthesa to screen large literature sets against defined search strategy and PICO criteria. We can work in parallel with your team, compare against prior screening decisions, or support high-volume projects where manual screening is not practical.
Useful when
- Your team has too many abstracts to screen manually
- You need an independent screening comparison
- A project is behind schedule
- You want to test AI-assisted screening without changing internal workflows
Data extraction
Synthesa can support structured data extraction from included studies, including study characteristics, population details, interventions, comparators, outcomes, follow-up durations, and statistical inputs for synthesis.
Useful when
- Extraction is slowing down project delivery
- Outcomes are numerous or inconsistently reported
- You need structured datasets for meta-analysis
- Internal teams need validated extraction support
Systematic reviews
We support systematic literature reviews for publication, medical strategy, evidence mapping, and client deliverables. Our workflows are designed to accelerate execution while maintaining transparency and expert oversight.
Useful when
- You need full SLR support
- Your internal team needs extra capacity
- The project has a large evidence base
- You need both speed and methodological confidence
Meta-analysis
Synthesa conducts frequentist and Bayesian meta-analyses across complex datasets, including multi-outcome projects and studies with heterogeneous reporting.
Useful when
- You need specialist statistical synthesis
- You have a dataset ready for analysis
- You need sensitivity analyses or meta-regression
- You need faster turnaround on statistical outputs
Network meta-analysis
For projects requiring indirect comparisons across interventions, Synthesa can support frequentist or Bayesian network meta-analysis.
Useful when
- Comparative evidence is fragmented
- Direct head-to-head evidence is limited
- You need to synthesise multiple interventions
- You need specialist NMA support without building internal capability
AI-powered delivery without asking your team to adopt another platform
Many AI tools promise faster reviews, but they require your team to configure software, learn a new workflow, manage outputs, and validate results internally.
Synthesa works differently.
You define the project. We deliver the evidence synthesis outputs. That means your team gets the benefit of AI-powered speed and scale without the burden of running AI workflows yourself.
- No platform implementation
- No software training for your team
- No disruption to existing client processes
- Expert-reviewed outputs
- Flexible support by work package or full project
- Suitable for overflow, acceleration, or specialist analysis
Choose the level of support you need
Overflow capacity
For agencies with more evidence synthesis work than internal bandwidth, Synthesa can take on defined components such as screening, extraction, or statistical synthesis.
Best for: Busy CROs, medcomms teams, and publication groups managing multiple client projects.
Parallel validation
Synthesa can run abstract screening or extraction in parallel with your internal team, allowing you to compare decisions and assess performance.
Best for: Teams that want to evaluate AI-powered workflows without changing current delivery processes.
Specialist statistical support
When projects require Bayesian meta-analysis, network meta-analysis, meta-regression, or high-volume outcome synthesis, Synthesa can provide specialist statistical support.
Best for: Agencies that need advanced synthesis capability without adding permanent specialist headcount.
End-to-end evidence synthesis delivery
Synthesa can manage the full evidence synthesis workflow, from screening to extraction, analysis, and structured reporting.
Best for: Client projects with tight timelines, large literature sets, or limited internal availability.
Designed for evidence synthesis projects that exceed human-only capacity
Synthesa’s workflows have been built for projects where scale, speed, and complexity matter.
- 1,000,000+ abstracts screened
- 20,000+ outcomes meta-analysed
- Average project delivery in 7 to 28 days
- 20% more relevant abstracts identified compared with human-only teams
- Peer-reviewed validation studies
- Experience with Bayesian and frequentist synthesis methods
Evaluate Synthesa with a free abstract screening pilot
A pilot is often the best way for CROs and medcomms agencies to assess whether Synthesa fits their delivery model.
We can screen a defined set of records using your search strategy and PICO criteria. The pilot can run in parallel with an active project or be compared against a completed review.
What the pilot includes
- Screening based on defined search strategy and PICO criteria
- Structured inclusion and exclusion decisions
- Screened abstract list
- Comparison point against internal or historical screening results
- Delivery within a few days
From 138,000 abstracts to published Bayesian meta-analysis
A research consortium investigating cardiac remodelling in pre-eclampsia needed to synthesise a large and complex evidence base. Synthesa screened 138,000 abstracts, extracted data from 75 relevant studies, and conducted Bayesian random-effects meta-analyses and meta-regressions in 3 weeks.
The work was published in a peer-reviewed journal.
Frenquently Asked Questions
Can Synthesa work under our process?
Yes. Synthesa can work with your search strategy, inclusion criteria, PICO framework, templates, reporting format, and project-specific requirements.
Do we need to use Synthesa’s software?
No. Synthesa delivers evidence synthesis as a service. Your team does not need to learn or operate new software.
Can Synthesa support only one part of the project?
Yes. We can support specific components such as abstract screening, data extraction, meta-analysis, or network meta-analysis.
Can Synthesa support urgent timelines?
Yes. Many projects are delivered within 7 to 14 days, depending on scope, data availability, and project complexity.
Can Synthesa work with anonymised or confidential client projects?
Yes. Synthesa can support projects where the end client remains confidential and where deliverables must align with your agency workflow.
Need evidence synthesis capacity without adding headcount?
Tell us about your project, timeline, and deliverables. We can help you decide whether a free screening pilot, defined work package, or full evidence synthesis project is the right fit.