Evidence synthesis for faster medical affairs insights
Synthesa helps medical affairs teams turn complex literature into structured evidence for medical strategy, publication planning, evidence gap assessment, and internal decision-making.
1,000,000+
abstracts screened
20,000+
outcomes meta-analysed
7 to 14 days
average project delivery
When the literature is too fragmented to interpret quickly
Medical affairs teams often need to answer complex evidence questions under time pressure.
You may need to understand the strength of evidence in a disease area, identify literature gaps, support a publication plan, evaluate outcomes across studies, or clarify whether existing evidence supports a scientific narrative.
Traditional review workflows can take months. Internal teams may not have the bandwidth to screen thousands of records, extract structured data, or run statistical synthesis quickly.
Synthesa provides expert-led evidence synthesis using AI-powered workflows, so your team receives clear, validated outputs without managing another tool internally.
Evidence synthesis across the medical strategy lifecycle
Identify what the literature supports, and what it does not
Synthesa helps teams map existing evidence, identify gaps, and understand where further research, communication, or publication activity may be needed.
Useful when you need to:
- Understand evidence strength across outcomes
- Identify under-researched populations or endpoints
- Compare published evidence across interventions or device categories
- Inform future publication or evidence generation priorities
Relevant services
Systematic Reviews, Rapid Evidence Synthesis, Abstract Screening
Move from literature to publishable evidence faster
Synthesa supports evidence synthesis projects designed to inform manuscripts, abstracts, congress submissions, and publication strategy.
Useful when you need to:
- Identify relevant studies quickly
- Extract data for publication-focused synthesis
- Conduct meta-analysis or meta-regression
- Build a structured evidence base around a scientific question
Relevant services
Systematic Reviews, Meta-Analysis, Network Meta-Analysis
Build scientific narratives on a structured evidence base
Medical strategy requires more than knowing that evidence exists. Teams need to understand how strong the evidence is, where it is consistent, where it is conflicting, and which findings matter most.
Useful when you need to:
- Clarify the evidence around a product, class, disease area, or outcome
- Support medical education or scientific exchange materials
- Understand the clinical context around a market or therapy area
- Compare evidence across outcomes or populations
Relevant services
Rapid Evidence Synthesis, Systematic Reviews, Meta-Analysis
Get reliable evidence quickly when timelines are short
When teams need to make decisions quickly, Synthesa can deliver focused evidence reviews in days rather than months.
Useful when you need to:
- Assess a new scientific question quickly
- Support internal planning discussions
- Understand whether the literature justifies deeper review
- Prepare for stakeholder meetings, advisory boards, or strategy sessions
Relevant services
Rapid Evidence Synthesis, Abstract Screening
From search results to structured evidence outputs
Depending on your project, Synthesa can deliver a focused work package or a complete evidence synthesis project.
Deliverables can include:
- Screened abstracts with inclusion and exclusion decisions
- Evidence maps and literature summaries
- Study characteristic tables
- Data extraction tables
- Outcome-level datasets
- Systematic literature reviews
- Frequentist or Bayesian meta-analyses
- Frequentist or Bayesian network meta-analyses
- Meta-regression and sensitivity analyses
- Publication-ready figures, tables, and summaries
Faster evidence synthesis without sacrificing expert review
Large CRO workflows can be effective, but they are often designed around longer timelines, larger teams, and more formal project structures.
Synthesa offers a more agile alternative for medical affairs teams that need speed, scale, and scientific clarity.
Traditional CRO workflow
- Longer setup and delivery timelines
- Manual screening and extraction bottlenecks
- Less practical for very large literature sets
- Often requires larger project commitments
- May be slower for focused or exploratory questions
Synthesa workflow
- Average project delivery in 7 to 14 days
- AI-powered screening and extraction support
- Expert validation and quality control
- Suitable for large literature sets and many outcomes
- Free pilot available for qualified abstract screening projects
Evidence synthesis delivered in 2 weeks
A medical affairs team wanted to establish the evidence-based advantage of a device category using existing published literature rather than initiating a new self-funded clinical study.
The evidence was scattered across many years of literature, but the underlying question had a clear answer.
Synthesa completed the screening, data extraction, and full meta-analysis of the outcomes in 2 weeks. The expected traditional timeline was 3 months.
You get the benefit of AI without having to operate it
Medical affairs teams should not need to become AI workflow managers to benefit from AI-enabled evidence synthesis.
With Synthesa, your team defines the question, criteria, and required outputs. We manage the AI-powered workflow, expert review, synthesis, and delivery.
- No new software to learn
- No internal AI workflow to configure
- Expert-reviewed outputs
- Transparent project logic
- Structured deliverables your team can use immediately
Start with a free abstract screening pilot
For qualified projects, Synthesa can run a free pilot using your defined search strategy and PICO criteria.
The pilot can be run in parallel with your team’s screening process or compared against a completed review. You receive a structured screened abstract list within a few days.
Need faster evidence synthesis for medical affairs?
Tell us about your project, timeline, and evidence question. We can help you decide whether to start with a free screening pilot, a rapid evidence synthesis project, or a full systematic review and meta-analysis.