DCB vs DES Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Efficacy of drug-coated balloons versus drug-eluting stents in bifurcated lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Efficacy of drug-coated balloons versus drug-eluting stents in bifurcated lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40180240

We’re proud to announce that Synthesa’s Co-founder and Chief Medical Officer, Lefteris Teperikidis, and his team have just published a new systematic review and meta-analysis in the Hellenic Journal of Cardiology! 

This study synthesizes evidence from 11 studies and 2,383 patients, offering new insights into the comparative efficacy of drug-coated balloons (DCBs) versus drug-eluting stents (DES) for complex coronary bifurcation lesions.

Key Findings:

  • DCBs and DES show comparable efficacy for major cardiovascular outcomes (MACE, TLR)
  • DCBs were significantly superior in reducing late lumen loss
  • Subgroup analysis revealed DCBs were especially effective in de novo bifurcated lesions

AI-assisted innovation:

The study transparently reports the use of AI tools like ChatGPT to support search strategy design, screening, data extraction, and R script generation—demonstrating Synthesa’s ongoing commitment to integrating AI into evidence synthesis workflows.

We’re thrilled to see Synthesa’s methodology and mission reflected in peer-reviewed work. 

Congratulations to Dr. Teperikidis and the entire author team!

Scroll to Top
Synthesa
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.